Benjamin Pietri vs Nikola Lulic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Looking at second serve performance from the past six months, Pietri has a 41.31% point win rate, while Lulic has a slightly higher rate at 42.36%. Could this small difference impact the match outcome? It might, as there's a strong link between this stat and match predictions.
• In terms of returning games, Pietri excels in recent matches, winning 42.35% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Lulic's 39.34%. Pietri also leads in first serve returns at 28.27% to Lulic's 25.81%.
• Analyzing performance under pressure, Pietri has a better record, saving 48.11% of breakpoints compared with Lulic's 41.86%, making this a useful number for predictions during the match.
• Over the past year, Pietri has claimed victory in 52.17% of matches, whereas Lulic has only 30% wins. Does this performance difference suggest a clear favorite? It leans in Pietri's favor.
• When playing on their preferred surfaces, Pietri shines on Hard courts with a 62% win rate, whereas Lulic’s performance on Clay is significantly lower at 26%, which is also his worst surface.
• The level of opposition faced shows Pietri’s average opponent rank is 189.61, while Lulic’s is 81.8, suggesting Lulic has faced tougher competition.
• Regarding deciding set performance, Pietri has emerged victorious in 57% of these situations, compared to Lulic's 29%, making Pietri more reliable in tight matches.
• Observing breakpoint conversions, Lulic has been more successful recently, converting 50% of break points, whereas Pietri lags behind with 33.33%.

Editorial Prediction (August 19, 2025, UTC):

As we approach this match, it's clear that each player's performance on second and return serves will be critical. Although Lulic has a narrowly better second serve win percentage, Pietri's superior return statistics may shift the balance.

Pietri's steady performance under pressure, evidenced by his higher breakpoint save rate, gives him an advantage in critical moments. This, combined with his consistent results over the year, suggests resilience that could tip the match in his favor.

The contrasting surfaces further highlight Pietri's dominance on Hard courts, while Lulic's weaker records on Clay both aid this assessment. Opponent quality also suggests Lulic has gone up against richer competition, adding complexity to the prediction.

Ultimately, factoring in deciding set performance leans heavily toward Pietri, reflecting superior nerves and endurance in key situations. Despite Lulic's proficiency in converting break points, the overall stats suggest that Pietri might be better positioned for victory.

Based on the detailed statistics, Pietri appears more likely to secure a win in the upcoming match.